Tort law or personal injury law offers legal rights to injury victims who’ve been psychologically or physically injured due to the wrongdoing or carelessness of another individual, government, company, or other entity.

Such laws apply to various cases, such as:

  • Cases where an individual acts out of carelessness and thus causes injury to another individual. Examples include slip and fall accidents, medical malpractice, car accidents, and toxic tort claims, among loads of others;
  • Cases where an individual knowingly and deliberately causes injury onto another individual. These kinds of cases take in battery, assault and murder;
  • Cases where an individual may have not deliberately carried out a wrongdoing via negligence on his or her part can be found legally responsible for such claim. Dog bite lawsuits (under a few state laws) and particular types of claims involving product liability are just examples of this kind of personal injury law;
  • Cases involving insult of character, like slander or libel.
Slip and fall
Slip and Fall Injury Case

Personal Injury Law’s Purpose

The main goal of such law is to offer legal rights for harmed victims to be rewarded financially following suffering from an injury or loss that they’d otherwise not have sustained if it wasn’t for the omissions or negligence of the responsible party.

Personal injury laws compel a legal liability on companies and people to carry out and connect with one another on adequate level of attention and care. These laws are intended to promote and encourage good conduct and lessen bad ones; thus, personal injury laws function as a vital purpose for everybody.

The Process of Personal Injury Cases

Though personal injury cases are not just the same as the other since no accidents are just the same, these kinds of cases usually have a tendency to follow the following steps:

  • A Defendant Injures Plaintiff. Except contractual breaches, this instance can be nearly any unscrupulous conduct on the part of the defendant.
  • Breaching a Legal Responsibility to the Plaintiff. The violated duty varies on the particulars of the case. For instance, or manufacturers have a legal responsibility to not permit harmful or dangerous drugs to get into the market.
  • Settlement Negotiations. If there’s clear evidence to both parties concerned that the Defendant violated his or her contractual duty, the defendant could choose to settle the issue outside of the court by providing financial compensation to the plaintiff to inhibit the plaintiff from submitting a case against the defendant.

And if the plaintiff doesn’t agree to the offer of the defendant, he or she could pursue in legal proceeding. A settlement can be provided and discussed following suit is submitted at any moment until a court or jury announces a verdict.

Plaintiff Files a Case against the Defendant

First, once the plaintiff files a case, he or she should be ready to state what the l claim’s legal basis is and what remedy type he or she desires to seek in compensation for the injuries sustained.

personal injury
Person injured in an accident.

The Defendant Submits an Answer to the Claim of the Plaintiff

The defendant should answer following being served by an official (usually a process server or a sheriff) within a particular period time. And if the defendant is unable to give an answer in a given time, a default verdict will be submitted and the plaintiff instantly wins.

After the Defendant Files an Answer, the Pre-Trial Period Starts

This period is meant for building the case of each party by gathering proof to support both sides. Discovery could be submitted among the two parties, expert witnesses could be employed, and depositions could be essential during these moments.

The Trial

During the trial, the plaintiff is obligated to prove that a liability was owed, and that, that liability was violated by the defendant, that the defendant’s breach directly led to injury or harm to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff sustained and suffered injuries due to the actions of the defendant.

The Verdict

The judge or the jury has the duty to determine whether the awards of the plaintiff in damages based on elements such as out-of-pocket therapeutic and medical expenses as well as the severity of psychological, emotional or physical pain sustained by the victim due to his injuries.