For those who are curious about medical malpractice cases, here’s information that you might want to know. The West Health Institute recently conducted a survey aiming to point out the deadly and pervasive issues of medical errors as well as to talk about possible solutions.
Medical device interoperability was the subject which talks about the capability to share medical information effortlessly across medical systems and devices.
For many years, hospitals, as well as healthcare facilities in the country, have increasingly begun using modern medical devices constructed to decrease medical errors.
On the other hand, reliable these tools may be, they hardly ever work alongside one another, depending instead on medical personnel (frequently nurses) to match up the information they provide and connect it with health records of the patients so as to provide the care properly.
As stated by the West Health Institute, better medical device interoperability may result in over $30 billion in savings annually to the health care system by means of reducing a number of the most widespread causes of medical errors, which make up 20% of unfavorable events; 17% for diagnostic errors; and 12% for failure to avoid injury.
Pros and Cons of Medical Technology in Hospitals
The study included 526 RNs (with a Bachelor’s degree or higher) working around the clock within a non-school environment. The nurses have posed 21 questions about the negative and positive facets of being employed in a hospital that incorporates medical technology.
Nearly all nurses accounted that they work together with 2 or more of these devices on each shift; with a few reporting, they work together with over 6. A good number stated that no less than one hour of each shift is being spent programming and working with these devices – time that may perhaps be spent on patient care.
Fifty percent of the nurses asked stated that they’d observed a medical error due to a need of device dexterity. Among these registered nurses, 60% stated that medical mistakes could be considerably lessened if medical tools were connected in a fashion wherein they automatically share data with one another.
There are a few machines that have now the means to share data, though unluckily, the majority isn’t prepared to do so, machines, for instance, vital signs monitors, defibrillators, electrocardiographs, infusion pumps and ventilators.
In a quite similar survey conducted for the HIMSS (Healthcare Information & Management Systems Society), a study of hospitals revealed that while more than 90% of them utilize 6 or more kinds of machines that could be included in the electronic health record (EHR) of a patient, only one-third of these establishments actually do.
And among the hospitals that really do spend in integration, typically less than 3 devices are integrated. That’s a contrary from the 6 to 10 machines that could surround a sole patient on a hospital bed.